was there a moral in "persepolis?" i got the feeling that starapi was trying to stay away from inserting a specific lesson into the story. this is one things that sort of opposes what white things a narrative is. i suppose there are a few things that the reader could take as morals. the closest i can think of is the idea of a "rebel with a cause." it is your prerogative to rebel against a dictator (especially a dicktator) or unjust ruler. however, there were also scenes of misguided rebellion, and the initial rebellion lead to lifestyle even more unhappy and dangerous for the families of iran. so the question of whether the rebellions was successful or not is never answered in the book. i feel that satrapi wanted to leave a lot of metaphorical doors open for the readers to explore after reading her story.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
narrative, truth, morals
for some reason when, when we are children, we are programmed to think that an autobiography has to be boring. we assume that it is told as a "chronicle"(as White depicts it) rather than a "history" (containing the word "story" for a reason) and is mostly a list of facts and events. it seems, however, that people take their story and make it more readable, more literary. why document your story though if it isn't even exactly your story, how it happened? i presume that the autobiographer picks a theme and chooses out the important parts that support the concept they are trying to portray through their narrative. Satrapi certainly had to do this to make her story specifically about the effect of the war on her coming-of-age. besides that, she probably said things that didn't happen. this makes me think of the "the things they carried." in that novel, tim o' brien talks about how sometimes when telling a story, one must exaggerate to share an honest feeling. essentially, in order to make the reader feel what the narrator was feeling, the narrator must change or amplify the actual events because reading them cannot simulate experiencing them. the desire that White talks about, the intrinsic desire to tell one's story, is rooted in the need to make others feel what you were feeling.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with what you said about going with a certain theme and choosing memories and stories that support that theme. I think some memories are going to have more weight and be more specific depending on what story is being told. Memories might have to be tweaked to fit the storyline.
ReplyDeleteI never really thought about how our culture was brought up to believe that autobiographies had to be boring, that was a great way to start the blog, a great attention grabber. This blog is well written. Great job!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this post! I like that you take on the idea of Autobiography and history as narration. I also like how you don't see a moral in Persepolis. (I didn't either.) But, I do think that there are a few ideas that a reader could take away from the novel... I think that after reading this book readers are far more aware of her experience, and that she is using her book to provide a deeper level of understanding in cultures outside of her own. (Frederick Douglass' autobiography comes to mind.) She doesn't tell readers what to think so much as exposes them to information that will (hopefully) cause them to think. =)
ReplyDeleteGreat job!
although there may not be one absolute lesson, i would say that there are lots of narrative lessons that indicate a general moral thrust. the novel certainly focuses on themes of alienation, identity, adherence, "following", etc... and by selecting these moments as crucial moments in the fomenting of her personhood, satrapi is doing the same things that white claims we are all doing. white really made me think a lot about what we as writers leave out, and what we as readers choose to focus on. what's not said can be just as important as what is.
ReplyDeleteYour comment about the exaggeration of one's own story reminds me of the "autobiography" A Million Little Pieces. In that instance no one would have cared whether some of the story was untrue as long as the author hadn't labeled it as an autobiography.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I have to agree with an earlier comment. I see what you mean about the lack of a 'moral' to the story, but I think the overall goal was to open the minds of international readers to a culture which had been severely pidgeon-holed.